Here is a step-by-step guide to using this lesson plan in the classroom/laboratory. We have suggested these steps as a possible plan of action. You may customize the lesson plan according to your preferences and requirements.

1. Topic introduction and discussion

Reading (40 min)

Begin your classroom session by introducing Dipesh Chakrabarty, the author of the essay ‘The Climate of History: Four Theses’, the text to be critically analyzed. Then ask your students to read the introduction to the essay.

Discuss the questions raised by the author about the environmental history of the planet reported to date using the following points:

• Why the discipline of history itself is unable to capture what is significantly different about what is called the Anthropocene
• Definition of Anthropocene and how humans have become geological agents
• The same faculty that allows us to picture the past also allows us to imagine the future

Now direct your students to read the essay closely.

At the end of every section, discuss the over-arching arguments presented by the author.

Read More

2. Extend understanding and summarize the key points of the essay

Video micro-lecture (~5 min)

Play the embedded video micro-lecture, “A Commentary on ‘The Climate of History: Four theses’” by Dr Maya Dodd, FLAME University, India to focus your students’ attention on the key points/arguments presented by the author of the essay.

Read More

Thesis 1 The distinction between natural and human history is a distinction that has to be dropped in this new era

• The assumption was that all history was the history of human affairs but we (humans) are now a part of the environment and this collapse that separated the natural from the man-made worlds requires a unity now in order to fully understand what the Anthropocene era entails.

Thesis 2 talks about the emergence of humans as a geological force and how this “severely qualifies humanist histories of modernity/ globalization”

• Has human freedom been placed under a cloud in the era of the Anthropocene?

Thesis 3 The Anthropocene requires us to put global histories of capital in conversation with the species history of humans

• The argument that we must mix these two histories comes from the fact that capitalism has also always changed but this is also to be seen as a species history. In modernity and early modernity and history needs to be viewed not in this short time frame and to think in species terms changes the way in which the discipline itself functions.

In the fourth thesis we can probe the limits of historical understanding by the cross hatching of species history and capital history.

3. Questions/Assignments

Use the tools and the concepts learned so far to discuss and determine answers to the following questions:

• How does the crisis of climate change spell the collapse of the distinction between Natural History and Human History?
• What is the idea of the Anthropocene and how does it qualify humanist theories of freedom?
• How do you reconcile the global histories of capital and the species history of humans in the Anthropocene?
• How does climate change challenge our understanding of the human universal or collectivity?

Use this lesson plan to help your students find answers to:

1. How does the crisis of climate change spell the collapse of the distinction between Natural History and Human History?
2. What is the idea of the Anthropocene and how does it qualify humanist theories of freedom?
3. How do you reconcile the global histories of capital and the species history of humans in the Anthropocene?
4. How does climate change challenge our understanding of the human universal or collectivity?